We don’t start with the return. We start with the evidence.
Follow one property from first look to final decision.

First, we establish what is actually true.
Verify the asset
We verify the property, its terms and the key details with original sources.
See what we verify
- Asking price
- USD 441 K (AED 1.62 M)
- Developer price list, 22 Aug 2026
- Layout and area
- 1 bed, 742 sq ft, mid floor
- Sale agreement plan
- Tenure
- Freehold, one allocated parking space
- Sale agreement
- Stated handover
- Q3 2028
- Developer, 22 Aug 2026
- Service charge
- 3.87 USD / sq ft (AED 14.20) per year
- 2026 budget of the delivered tower
- Developer delivery record
- First tower delivered within four months of its stated date
- Handover notices, 2025
Evidence
- Developer price list, 22 Aug 2026
- Sale agreement plan
- Sale agreement
- Developer, 22 Aug 2026
- 2026 budget of the delivered tower
- Handover notices, 2025
JH-2588 · Illustrative sample
Marasi Riverside, Tower B
Business Bay · Off-plan
- Unit size
- 742 sq ft
- Unit type
- 1 bedroom
- Asking price
- USD 441 KAED 1.62 M
- Handover
- Q3 2028
We model the income and the net return.
Build the economics · Break the case
One consistent approach, so every opportunity can be compared like for like.
See full assumptions
- Downside
- 4.3%
- Rent
- 8% below the comparables
- Void
- Eight weeks a year
- Exit yield
- One point wider
- Base
- 5.4%
- Rent
- As the comparables
- Void
- Four weeks a year
- Exit yield
- As today
- Upside
- 6.0%
- Rent
- Not stated in this sample
- Void
- Not stated in this sample
- Exit yield
- Not stated in this sample
Evidence
- Six comparable lettings in the delivered tower, last nine months
- 2026 budget, delivered tower
- AED 112,700Market rent
- (8,669)Void allowanceFour weeks a year
- (10,536)Service charge742 sq ft
- (5,635)Management fee5% of rent
- AED 87,860Net income
5.4%Net yield · base case
The service charge is what makes the income work.
- Downside
- 4.3%
- Base case
- 5.4%
- Upside
- 6.0%
The upside is not evidenced in this sample.
AED 87,860 · 5.4% of the asking price, base case
What could make us wrong?
Read the market · Name what can go wrong · Grade the evidence
We stress-test the risks that could change the case.
Evidence
- DLD transaction records for the community
- The developer's price list, plan and handover notices
SupplyOpen questionAbout 1,900 units completing in Business Bay in 2027 and 2028, in the same segment
- What could happen?
- Rent below the comparables and a slower first letting; the downside case.
- What remains unresolved?
- Whether absorption holds its recent pace through the first wave.
DeliveryMitigationA slip past the stated quarter
- What could happen?
- The first rent a year later while the payment plan continues.
- What reduces the risk?
- Handover terms in the sale agreement, and the developer's record on the last two towers.
Service chargeMitigationA budget a fifth above the delivered tower
- What could happen?
- About one point off the net yield.
- What reduces the risk?
- Modelled on the delivered tower's budget, not the estimate; to be confirmed at handover.
- 2022First tower in the community delivered
- 2025Second tower delivered, four months late, let within a quarter
- 2027 to 2028About 1,900 units scheduled to complete in Business Bay
- Q3 2028Stated handover for this tower
See market evidence
Two towers delivered in the community by this developer since 2022, both let within a quarter of handover. Roughly 1,900 units are scheduled to complete in Business Bay across 2027 and 2028, which is more than the last two years combined; absorption over the last twelve months ran ahead of that pace, but not by much.
The property may work. The timing may not.
Data confidence
Moderate
LimitedModerateHighEnough to model on. Not enough to be sure of.
What keeps this from High?
What is missing
- Six lettings is enough to model on and not enough to be sure of
- No service-charge budget exists yet for this tower
- The upside case is not evidenced in this sample
What would move it to High
- A further quarter of lettings in the delivered tower
- The developer's own budget for this tower
The sources
- Six comparable lettings in the delivered tower
- DLD transaction records for the community
- The developer's price list, plan and handover notices
- The delivered tower's 2026 service-charge budget
All lettings within the last nine months; transactions to 31 August 2026
For rental income at this price, we would proceed.
The comparables are recent and in the same building, the charge is taken from a delivered budget, and the downside case still clears four per cent net.
See the full investment memo- Data confidence
- LimitedModerateHigh
- Scope
- Rental income
- Not for
- Capital appreciation
The 2027 supply caps the exit for the first two years.
See it all in context.
The investment memo holds the full evidence behind this page, and the signed view.
A consistent process. A clearer decision.
Seven checks for every opportunity, from the facts and the economics to the risks, the evidence and a signed view.
- 01Verify the asset
- 02Build the economics
- 03Read the market
- 04Break the case
- 05Name what can go wrong
- 06Grade the evidence
- 07Sign the view
Explore the full framework
01 Property facts
Title, area, layout, service charge, developer record.
What we look at
- The title deed or sale agreement, the registered area and the plan, read against the listing.
- The service charge as budgeted for a delivered building, not the estimate in a brochure.
- The stated handover date beside the developer's record on its last two projects.
02 Financial analysis
Net yield from comparable lettings, costs taken out.
What we look at
- Comparable lettings in the same building or community, dated, with their sizes and rents.
- A void allowance and the service charge deducted before anything is called a net yield.
- Every figure shown with the date or basis it was produced on.
03 Developer and market
Delivery record, current supply, what is coming.
What we look at
- What the developer delivered, when, and how far from the stated date.
- Units scheduled to complete in the community over the next two years, from published launch data.
- Absorption over the last twelve months, from transaction records.
04 Scenario testing
Downside, base and upside, moved together.
What we look at
- Three cases, with the assumptions behind each written out rather than left in a model.
- Rent, void and exit yield moved together, because in a soft market they move together.
- The downside built from a specific event, usually the next delivery wave, not a round number.
05 Risk assessment
The two or three things that could go wrong.
What we look at
- Each risk with its likely effect on income or exit, in figures where the figures exist.
- What would reduce it, or the question that stays open, stated as such.
- No score. A named risk is more useful than a number nobody can trace.
06 Data confidence
How well evidenced every figure is.
What we look at
- The sources behind the figures, how many, and how recent.
- What the evidence cannot tell us yet, written down.
- A word, limited, moderate or high, and what would move it up.
07 Management review
A person signs the view.
What we look at
- The concluding assessment, with the reasoning in one paragraph a reader can repeat.
- The conditions under which the view holds, and the objectives it does not serve.
- A name and a date on it.